Current:Home > ContactCalifornia voters reject measure that would have banned forced prison labor -ProfitPioneers Hub
California voters reject measure that would have banned forced prison labor
View
Date:2025-04-18 17:41:52
Follow AP’s coverage of the election and what happens next.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California voters have rejected a measure on the November ballot that would have amended the state constitution to ban forced prison labor.
The constitution already prohibits so-called involuntary servitude, but an exception allows it to be used as a punishment for crime.
That exemption became a target of criminal justice advocates concerned that prisoners are often paid less than $1 an hour for labor such as fighting fires, cleaning cells and doing landscaping work at cemeteries.
The failed Proposition 6 was included in a package of reparations proposals introduced by lawmakers this year as part of an effort to atone and offer redress for a history of discrimination against Black Californians.
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law in the package in September to issue a formal apology for the state’s legacy of racism against African Americans. But state lawmakers blocked a bill that would have created an agency to administer reparations programs, and Newsom vetoed a measure that would have helped Black families reclaim property taken unjustly by the government through eminent domain.
Abolish Slavery National Network co-founder Jamilia Land, who advocated for the initiative targeting forced prison labor, said the measure and similar ones in other states are about “dismantling the remnants of slavery” from the books.
“While the voters of California did not pass Proposition 6 this time, we have made significant progress,” she said in a statement. “We are proud of the movement we have built, and we will not rest until we see this issue resolved once and for all.”
George Eyles, a retired teacher in Brea who voted against Prop 6, said he found it confusing that the initiative aimed to ban slavery, which was outlawed in the U.S. in the 19th century. After finding out more about the measure, Eyles decided it likely would not be economically feasible since prison labor helps cut costs for upkeep, he said.
“I really couldn’t get any in-depth information about ... the thinking behind putting that whole Prop 6 forward, so that made me leery of it,” Eyles said. “If I really can’t understand something, then I’m usually going to shake my head, ‘No.’”
Multiple states — including Colorado, Tennessee, Alabama and Vermont — have voted to rid their constitutions of forced labor exemptions in recent years, and this week they were joined by Nevada, which passed its own measure.
In Colorado — the first state to get rid of an exception for slavery from its constitution in 2018 — incarcerated people alleged in a 2022 lawsuit filed against the corrections department that they were still being forced to work.
Proposition 6’s ballot language did not explicitly include the word “slavery” like measures elsewhere, because the California Constitution was amended in the 1970s to remove an exemption for slavery. But the exception for involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime remained on the books.
The 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution also bans slavery and involuntary servitude except as a punishment for crime.
Proposition 6 saw the second-least campaign spending among the 10 statewide initiatives on the ballot this year, about $1.9 million, according to the California Secretary of State’s office. It had no formal opposition.
___
Austin is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Austin on Twitter: @ sophieadanna
veryGood! (546)
Related
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- People addicted to opioids rarely get life-saving medications. That may change.
- Colorado Anti-Fracking Activists Fall Short in Ballot Efforts
- Where Is the Green New Deal Headed in 2020?
- Boy who wandered away from his 5th birthday party found dead in canal, police say
- You Didn't See It Coming: Long Celebrity Marriages That Didn't Last
- Newest doctors shun infectious diseases specialty
- Revolve's 65% Off Sale Has $212 Dresses for $34, $15 Tops & More Trendy Summer Looks
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Over half of car crash victims had drugs or alcohol in their systems, a study says
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- What’s Causing Antarctica’s Ocean to Heat Up? New Study Points to 2 Human Sources
- Psychedelic drugs may launch a new era in psychiatric treatment, brain scientists say
- Mass. Court Bans Electricity Rate Hikes to Fund Gas Pipeline Projects
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Why Adam Levine is Temporarily Returning to The Voice 4 Years After His Exit
- Coping With Trauma Is Part of the Job For Many In The U.S. Intelligence Community
- Coal Lobbying Groups Losing Members as Industry Tumbles
Recommendation
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Pennsylvania Ruling on Eminent Domain Puts Contentious Pipeline Project on Alert
Over half of car crash victims had drugs or alcohol in their systems, a study says
Today’s Climate: September 23, 2010
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Climate Change Treated as Afterthought in Second Presidential Debate
Dakota Access Opponents Thinking Bigger, Aim to Halt Entire Pipeline
Solar Energy Surging in Italy, Outpacing U.S.