Current:Home > MyFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -ProfitPioneers Hub
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:01:35
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Abortion restrictions in Russia spark outrage as the country takes a conservative turn
- Kris Jenner calls affair during Robert Kardashian marriage 'my life's biggest regret'
- Israel-Hamas war upends years of conventional wisdom. Leaders give few details on what comes next
- How breaking emerged from battles in the burning Bronx to the Paris Olympics stage
- 5 Things podcast: Anti-science rhetoric heavily funded, well-organized. Can it be stopped?
- An Idaho woman sues her fertility doctor, says he used his own sperm to impregnate her 34 years ago
- Alone in car, Michigan toddler dies from gunshot wound that police believe came from unsecured gun
- Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
- Exclusive: Mother of 6-year-old Muslim boy killed in alleged hate crime speaks out
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- AP Week in Pictures: Asia
- Maine massacre among worst mass shootings in modern US history
- Key North Carolina GOP lawmakers back rules Chair Destin Hall to become next House speaker
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Buccaneers vs. Bills live updates: Predictions, odds, how to watch Thursday Night Football
- FDA warns about risks of giving probiotics to preterm babies after infant's death
- Britney Spears' Ex Sam Asghari Reacts to Her Memoir Revelation About Their Marriage
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Who is Robert Card? Confirmed details on Maine shooting suspect
What happened during the Maine shootings last night? A timeline of the tragedy
South Korean and US forces stage drills for reaction to possible ‘Hamas-style’ attack by North Korea
Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
'Fellow Travelers' is an 'incredibly sexy' gay love story. It also couldn't be timelier.
Abortions in the U.S. rose slightly after states began imposing bans and restrictions post-Roe, study finds
Son of federal judge in Puerto Rico pleads guilty to killing wife after winning new trial