Current:Home > ContactVoter fraud case before NC Supreme Court may determine how much power state election officials have -ProfitPioneers Hub
Voter fraud case before NC Supreme Court may determine how much power state election officials have
View
Date:2025-04-12 15:56:02
RALEIGH, N.C (AP) — North Carolina’s highest court could determine whether election officials retain special legal privileges that allow them to defame individual voters and set a precedent for how voter fraud claims are pursued.
The North Carolina Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Thursday morning for Bouvier v. Porter — a suit that has lingered in state courts over the past seven years. The case centers around four voters from Guilford and Brunswick County who claim they were defamed by supporters of former Republican Gov. Pat McCrory in the aftermath of the 2016 election.
By a margin of 10,277 votes, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper beat McCrory in the 2016 gubernatorial election. Afterward, McCrory supporters filed election protest petitions declaring voting irregularities had occurred, including accusations from Greensboro Republican official William Porter.
The election protests accused four people of voting twice in Guilford County, according to the plaintiffs’ 2017 lawsuit. Porter’s petition against three Guilford voters was dismissed for “lack of any evidence presented” and one protest in Brunswick County was withdrawn, according to an appeals court opinion.
The plaintiffs claimed they were defamed by Porter’s petition and sought $25,000 in damages, the complaint says.
It’s not clear if the case will be decided before the 2024 election, according to one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers.
More defendants were named in an amended complaint later that year, including law firm Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky and the Pat McCrory Committee Legal Defense Fund. Another plaintiff from Brunswick County was also added to the case when one of the original voters voluntarily left the case, according to the amended complaint.
But the case before the N.C. Supreme Court won’t determine if the allegations defamed the voters. Instead, it focuses on whether the defendants had a form of immunity known as absolute privilege to make those claims.
Absolute privilege is a legal term used in defamation cases to outline circumstances where someone is shielded from liability for potentially defamatory statements. The privilege is typically granted in judicial and legislative proceedings.
A North Carolina appeals court gave plaintiffs a partial victory in 2021 by ruling that McCrory’s legal fund and the law firm did not have absolute privilege. They did rule, however, that Porter was granted the privilege because he operated within a “quasi-judicial election protest proceeding.”
But the defendants are arguing to the state Supreme Court bench that they should all have immunity. By not granting absolute privilege to all those involved, it prevents people concerned about elections from speaking “freely and fearlessly,” the brief read.
Bob Hunter, an attorney for the Pat McCrory Committee Legal Defense Fund, declined The Associated Press’ request for comment.
The defendants didn’t function in a capacity that would grant them absolute privilege, as they “ghostwrote” the petitions for others to sign off on, plaintiff attorney and chief counsel for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice Jeff Loperfido said. If the N.C. Supreme Court sides with the defendants, he said voter fraud allegations may be used to deter voters or sow distrust in state electoral systems.
“It’s really about the fundamental right to vote and about whether individuals, North Carolina citizens, can be used as political pawns in this way and have their names tarnished without consequences,” said Loperfido, who joined the case in 2018.
Much has changed since the appeals ruling. One of the plaintiffs, Karen Niehans, died in early 2023, which caused her defamation claim to be dismissed, Loperfido said. The remaining plaintiffs are retirees, he said.
The N.C. Supreme Court’s makeup has also shifted since the appellate decision to comprise of five Republicans and two Democrats — both of whom had to recuse themselves after previously working as attorneys for the plaintiffs.
But a panel of all Republican judges doesn’t concern Loperfido because he views the case as nonpartisan.
“This could have been any losing candidate’s campaign effort to try to create enough smoke to delay certification or try to encourage the state board of election to review these protests in a certain way,” he said.
Now, both parties will await a decision after oral arguments conclude. Loperfido says that could take about six months, depending on whether the court wants to release an opinion after the 2024 election.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Zendaya’s Futuristic Dune: Part Two Premiere Look Has a NSFW Surprise
- Kansas City mass shooting is the 50th so far this year, gun violence awareness group says
- Utah school board seeks resignation of member who questioned athlete’s gender
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- US eases restrictions on Wells Fargo after years of strict oversight following scandal
- You'll Swoon Over Millie Bobby Brown and Jake Bongiovi's Valentine's Day Date
- Lottery, casino bill passes key vote in Alabama House
- Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
- Man claims $1 million lottery prize on Valentine's Day, days after break-up, he says
Ranking
- Sonya Massey's family keeps eyes on 'full justice' one month after shooting
- Public utilities regulator joins race for North Dakota’s single U.S. House seat
- The Truth About Vanderpump Rules' It's Not About the Pasta Conspiracy Revealed
- All 58 Louisiana death row inmates with no execution date wait as bill proposes death by nitrogen gas
- RFK Jr. closer to getting on New Jersey ballot after judge rules he didn’t violate ‘sore loser’ law
- 'Jeopardy' contestant answers Beyoncé for '50 greatest rappers of all time' category
- Detroit Pistons' Isaiah Stewart arrested for allegedly punching Phoenix Suns' Drew Eubanks before game
- Photos: Uber, Lyft drivers strike in US, UK on Valentine's Day
Recommendation
Jury finds man guilty of sending 17-year-old son to rob and kill rapper PnB Rock
UGG Boots Are on Sale for 53% Off- Platform, Ultra Mini, & More Throughout Presidents’ Day Weekend
New Hampshire Senate rejects enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution
Oklahoma radio station now playing Beyoncé's new country song after outcry
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Recession has struck some of the world’s top economies. The US keeps defying expectations
Michigan school shooter’s father wants a jury from outside the community
Steady ascent or sudden splash? North Carolina governor’s race features men who took different paths