Current:Home > reviewsTexas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban -ProfitPioneers Hub
Texas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-11 23:28:58
Austin, Texas — A lawyer representing 20 women and two doctors argued before the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court on Tuesday that women have been denied lifesaving care under the state's strict abortion law as they seek to clarify what qualifies as a medical exception.
"We are just seeking clarification on what the law aims to do," said Molly Duane, a lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the lawsuit.
Five women who were denied abortions under the state filed the lawsuit in March, and they were later joined by 17 other plaintiffs, including two doctors. The lawsuit, which was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights, is believed to be the first to be brought by women who were denied abortions after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.
Unlike other legal challenges to abortion laws, this case does not seek to overturn Texas' ban but rather to clarify what qualifies as a medical exemption. But Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby said the job of the court is to "decide cases," and not to "elaborate and expand laws in order to make them easier to understand or enforce."
Beth Klusmann, a lawyer for the state, argued Tuesday that the women did not have the standing to sue, suggesting that the women should have instead sued their doctors for medical malpractice.
Duane argued on Tuesday that because the law is unclear, the women were denied lifesaving care, and that the state's interpretation means that "women would need to have blood or amniotic fluid dripping down their leg before they can come to court."
Earlier this year, a judge in Austin ruled that women who experience pregnancy complications are exempt from the state's abortion ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed the ruling, bringing the legal challenge to the state Supreme Court.
In August, Travis County Judge Jessica Mangrum placed an injunction on the law, ruling that the plaintiffs faced "an imminent threat of irreparable harm under Texas's abortion bans. This injunction is necessary to preserve Plaintiffs' legal right to obtain or provide abortion care in Texas in connection with emergent medical conditions under the medical exception and the Texas Constitution."
The injunction was put on hold when Paxton appealed.
- In:
- Texas
- Abortion
veryGood! (37)
Related
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Department of Education opens investigation into Harvard University's legacy admissions
- Northwestern football players to skip Big Ten media days amid hazing scandal
- Department of Education opens investigation into Harvard University's legacy admissions
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Comedian Dave Chappelle announces fall dates for US comedy tour
- ‘Our own front line’: Ukrainian surgeons see wave of wounded soldiers since counteroffensive began
- As Twitter fades to X, TikTok steps up with new text-based posts
- Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
- Barbie Director Greta Gerwig Reveals If a Sequel Is Happening
Ranking
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- U.S. sees biggest rise in COVID-19 hospitalizations since December
- Domestic EV battery production is surging ahead, thanks to small clause in Inflation Reduction Act
- As Twitter fades to X, TikTok steps up with new text-based posts
- Sonya Massey's family keeps eyes on 'full justice' one month after shooting
- Water at tip of Florida hits hot tub level, may have set world record for warmest seawater
- Trans man's violent arrest under investigation by Los Angeles sheriff's department
- Cigna health giant accused of improperly rejecting thousands of patient claims using an algorithm
Recommendation
American news website Axios laying off dozens of employees
Education Department investigating Harvard's legacy admission policies
Sarah Jessica Parker Shares Rare Insight Into Family Life With Her and Matthew Broderick's Kids
CFPB fines Bank of America. What that means for you.
51-year-old Andy Macdonald puts on Tony Hawk-approved Olympic skateboard showing
Trump’s Former Head of the EPA Has Been a Quiet Contributor to Virginia’s Exit From RGGI
CFPB fines Bank of America. What that means for you.
It's hot out there. A new analysis shows it's much worse if you're in a city